RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The traditionally reported outcomes for patients with ischemic wounds have centered on amputation-free survival. However, that discounts the importance of other patient-centered outcomes such as the wound healing time (WHT) and wound-free period (WFP). We evaluated the long-term wound outcomes of patients treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia at our institution. METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, we identified all patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and ischemic wounds using symptomatic and hemodynamic criteria. The primary data included the wound size, wound location, WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) grade, WHT, WFP, minor and major amputation, and death. Wounds were not considered healed if the patient had required a major amputation or had died before wound healing. The WHT was calculated as the interval in days between the diagnosis and determination of a healed wound. The WFP was calculated as the interval in days between a healed wound and wound recurrence, major amputation, death, or the end of the study period. A comparison of the wound healing parameters stratified by revascularization status was performed using the Student t test. A generalized linear model adjusted for age, sex, initial wound size, and WIfI grade was used to evaluate the risk of wound healing with and without revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients had presented with 372 wounds. Of the 256 patients, 48% had undergone revascularization. During the study period, 97 minor amputations and 100 major amputations had been required, and 132 patients had died. The average wound size was 13.9 ± 52.0 cm2; however, for the 155 wounds that had healed, the average size was only 4.0 ± 9.6 cm2 (P = .002). No differences were found in the wound size when stratified by revascularization status (P = .727). Adjusted for the initial wound size, the risk of wound healing was not different when stratified by revascularization (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.87; P = .354). For those whose wounds had healed, the average WHT and WFP were 173 ± 169 days and 775 ± 317 days, respectively. The WHT was not faster for the revascularized group (155 days vs 188 days; P = .221). When stratified by revascularization status, the rate of wound recurrence was 4.6 vs 8.9 wounds per 100 person-years for the revascularized and nonrevascularized groups, respectively (P = .125). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that, except for patients who presented with severe ischemia, revascularization was not associated with improved rates of wound healing. Among the wounds that healed, regardless of the initial ischemia grade, revascularization was not associated with a faster WHT or longer WFPs.
